1. DID CANADA RECEIVE EFFECTIVE ASISTANCE OF COUNSEL

2. WAS THERE AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION TO BRINGING OF CANADA MENKAL HEALHL INJUSTICE DUNNG SENTENUNG

3. WAS ThERE A MANIFEST

4. A APPEAL WAJ

5. WAS LERE A PROCEDURALLY DEFAULT this prEJUDICE

6. WAS thErE A AbUSE OF DISCrETiON DUrINg

7. WAS NEANY JYN LAtEr AFTEr JAKINg ThE PLEA

8. WAS hERE A DEPRIVE OF LIbEMTS ANd FREEDOM PUHINS BANADA BACK IN PRISON OUER O IMES FOR ND ADDRESS

9. WAS LS CONSTiTUES & DOUBLE PUNNLMENT

10. WAS LERE A ABUSC OF DISCRETON PLAUNG CANADA ON INTENSE SUPSRVISEJ rELEASE B DEpt oF Corretion ANd Not 6y he JuDgE DURINS LE SENTENCING PROCEEDINSS

12. WAS CANADA ON thE GrOuNdS oF HIM beNg A WitNkSS AGAINST HIMSELF WITLOUT DUE PROCESS OF CAW

13. CAN STICL STANd rIAL FACE CANADA CONFIONT His ACCUSE

14. WAS CANAISA CONVICTED 67 A TOIAL Jury Found guilty ANd beyoNd A Doust REAJONABLE

15. thEre DNA WAS TESTED to prove EVIDENCE do 3dh OF RAPE ANY

16. the PLEA ASriMt WAS the tErMS OF FULLFILLED AS prOMISE

17. WAS CANADA put IN Jropardy twee oR MOrE

18. WAS PAROCE ASEN VIOLATES CANADA CIVIL Rights PLALNg HIN IN SEX OFFEMEN HAD A HEATMENT WL:LE 31HAbEAS CORPUs FICEj Appral

19. this LEGAL PUHINg WAS CANAUJA BACKIN PRJON FOR ND AUDES CAUSINS HIM to Jabs 3507 3 FULL tIME SNCE 2013 CARE SERVICES, FONIC RESTAURANT, ANd 371+X34 MC DONALD'S PROCEDURE EMROR DURINS SENTENCING or WAS hE A PANLE OFFICENS OF OLMSTED COunty Put BACK IN PRISON CANADA OUES 1O+IMES OR DID NOt ALLOW HIM tO LEAUC PNNN BECAUSE OF NO ADDRESS

Did Canada receive effective assistance of counsel?