Timothy S. Chalfant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Whether the Social Security Administration and federal courts have to follow the same laws and rules that apply to all other litigants
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED OB SHourn ALL MSTRIAT ANQ FERERACL SRAM IT COURTS HAVE. TO Fettow SLA LAWSCCRULE tIHE*D COM)S IO ErRIRME LE UAEAK ES THAT “A SOLAR Secuei nd APPLIC AAST~ NiQ MOT PRESEAJT~ 72 THE Som iALX SECUE TY ALS, BUT SUB FOR THA Fest TTIW TO THE APPEALS Coupee _P As HACCE~) 19 AY ASE TIMSTHE S MA LEA Ur Cortetiss(JEO_ OPW Sac 4X SEC ue r Ty ANQ ALSO 14) HIEEQ/AIBOTHATA VU). BRARCAIHAR BUT AS AICERIBOTHAM VU. BAG OHHET~ HOR FBX 333534 CSTH CIR. D008) SHE FIFTH KteCu (FT ACCEPTED THE ee ool —— CURB E AQ KMAADD GAC TO THEA, Bot JD (19 CASE. TIMOTHY 6 CHALART~ J COMM ISSIOSET2A_OF STATED “AS THIS IS COD preqe TO THE THVRD) RC IF SHOucn ACL DIST Ra AAA KE DEest_ COURTS HAVE FO FOLD SMILIAR_ ASE LAW He) CT" AALS QUT a FEBECAC. (PR Gt 7 Pr FIUS LINE A DVOoUaLE STHOOATA THAT THE Aree Draw THA COuATTEY Gy HUE 1079 STAY PETE LUE FH OUT CANE. OK A KEDE HK (YROGreA 4, SHOKLD Ases FUAT AHA UE. PUMA ALR— TV RLUMST OWES QE Peucet) O06) Di KFENITEY JUST BECAUSE FOU LIL “JA OF e4 Ls Aveta QD yee P<ose ACCELL ACT ASE Like 1eSE. Mi Al EFOrE ALD FH Fei Et TE FO Bef VATV CL ATO TPKE. SULEUR COUrTET AK CASES TWIT IIE PUL 0x) DOLLAR TIO RIES TS POOP ESAIT— THEY ? © oh THE SOCMAK Secure 1 TY ALCS ECC Oe | pwHlez) HE FAILEL TO AO LYeae IR NSCUSS EXE! TUS) (OSE) OMS OFS, pe) HE CELLED (TAT LETTE DUCE +The, OCA HACIAG? Ts TUS BLOUSES FO RE AAIO ? @ LE THE SOCAL SENET AL) USED posT MITE LAST Sn @E) (CLEOPAS TO Non wroeLAG WE, CHWALFA ITS SEUEITS OF J NOAWEPNEDST ES 1 BAT AED TO USL A GOVE SOAR REPORT LE TICLRLOM ae HE QuUuetEh Oe, Tuc APS KE UE) AIND EMPCHASLS PIHNECA THE DOETIXR AWED AMAE , Dos WIVS LLEOL2 IO S FO recatAety B QD THE WESTIE CAD OISTOEE TOUT SUQGE Found FYeCORS eR) TW. ALCS S OPIKW700), GHEE SUS6E ROUWN MEDIAL EHO eOAS COEUCOCATILY Ar SCF ACVXA_\ OF 2074/14 HE GLS WEVUER AMVESS EA . THE SUC QUT THESE CFF ASR AAMAS SECoves, Tos JUWIS EGreourPOS TFC (CERT ARS P QD stours HAVE, THE. THEO ceca comet . DSBS 1 LLAICT SHAT MY ATTIOR AMES PE REOCMES A TIEQ@VEY MALLLACTICE C5 (AILIKG TO COITACT WP DOCTOES AOS LET MEDICAL CEO OE TE succor C4 ZLAICT AAS FOR MABIYE ARY ACBHTE SS je) SUPCORT OF 14 MisAQ!IITT CLAP SHE ALS EOE) ACAI OID ER HES FAILURE, FO AQUA AAC ABET TO SulPoreTH MY LAID, LAS THES CROCNO Te BD cock Socsae Sewer TH ITte I CUES ACE A CITILE UACUE AS TO LvHAL AiSABILITY CASE 15 ADSAD) CATED» AOS Bee THAT THE TH CA SCCM COURT HAE AL OVER IT~ (LITER LIREATA TINS ABOUT THE CULES OA) ACCEPTING EU CENCE THEA THE CULES ALOCTEKK KI THE Sco, FOUATH, EIGATH , Aya AALS TEAITH Lue uITS: SNOULO ACC. CUCM IT SDaete WANE TO FOLLOW THE SAME RULES JJHEN st O€ACS LiTtH A ALIA (Y COCA , sHouch THE SUP EENE. COU*7T STIEF? (A) TO AWALY ZL THE WAY THE LOWELL COURTS ACPLG THESE CURS D IKFEPREAJTI SRKAUSE DE THE BEING A DEA — Areoereary PTS MINKE, FOC. AO MANICURE) APCUATION OF Ene LAW Cenc , SEIS SHAT THEA igen ee OA GCETER MINE Our LASES OUTCOME, (D DIOS THE DLS AMWQ THE [VESTIFO DISTRICT ZOUET SUOCE MAE ere ores (0 7 CA SE ZirT Hy 3 CUA LAT Do OPA SENOS TR OK <0c)Al. SCE 1 TP) KC OKO TO TTR CEPA AA (REMAIN OTS peerwen) 7