No. 18-7541
Adrian G. Rangel v. Tippecanoe County, Indiana, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: absolute-immunity appeals civil-procedure civil-rights complaint court-of-appeals dismissal due-process federal-court federal-trial-court immunity jurisdiction legal-error standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh and the Hammond Indiana Federal Trial Court err in dismissing Petitioner's Complaint based solely on Defendants' contended absolute immunity?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED (~ Question Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh and the Hammond Indiana Federal Trial Court err in dismissing Petitioner’s Complaint based solely on Defendants’ contended absolute immunity ? 1
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-08
Waiver of right of respondents Tippecanoe County, IN, et al. to respond filed.
2019-01-25
Waiver of right of respondent Tippecanoe County, IN to respond filed.
2019-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Tippecanoe County, IN
Douglas Joseph Masson — Hoffman, Luhman & Masson, PC, Respondent
Douglas Joseph Masson — Hoffman, Luhman & Masson, PC, Respondent
Tippecanoe County, IN, et al.
Stephen Richard Creason — Respondent
Stephen Richard Creason — Respondent