Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the entry of a prior administrative-removal order against the petitioner was not fundamentally unfair, even though the petitioner was not removable as charged and was not amenable to administrative-removal proceedings

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW This petition presents a request for error correction. The Ninth Circuit held that the entry of a prior order against Petitioner was not fundamentally unfair because Petitioner lacked lawful status in the United States— even though he was not removable as charged and was not amenable to proceedings. Did the court of appeals err? prefix