No. 18-7556
Michael James Horton v. Clark E. Ducart, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure critical-trial-stages due-process pro-se-representation right-to-be-present right-to-counsel self-representation standing statutory-interpretation trial-procedure
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the unequivocal right to represent oneself or have counsel should be left ambiguous
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PreSeNTed -— oO FX ONS _JUSTiCe so eloQuent ly pot Veo “Lest We SEHe WWISTI Ch ONL DAT TR AROUND ) Sttouks THE UNE@ViVOCA RLGKT TO RENRESENT ONES SEIF OR HAVE COUNSe| ee ler T AHBIGiOVUS 7 . Z.) StoUia THe RBiGHyT TO BE PRESENT ANT -N\| (CRITICAL STAGES OF TRIAI Be lefT For. Heenless CeaRroR. Vv Respec#reoily SUBMATTRD, WS aafeal fe (Sifu
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent Clark E. Ducart, Warden to respond filed.
2018-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Clark E. Ducart, Warden
Ernesto Carlos Dominguez — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Ernesto Carlos Dominguez — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent