No. 18-7560
Marcus Leland Freeman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court below erred by misconstruing the petitioner's motion based on Buck v. Dinis by failing to apply the correct legal analysis standard under Gonzalez vs Crosby
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | WHETHER We COURT BELOW ERRED BY MISCONSTRUING THE PETITIONER'S MoTION BASED ON BUCK v«. DINIS BY FAVING TO APPLY THE CORRECT LEGAL ANALYSIS STANDARD UNDER CONZALEZ vs CROSBY ,
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent