No. 18-7575
Alexis Valdes Gonzalez v. United States
Tags: criminal-case criminal-procedure due-process eleventh-circuit judicial-process mandatory-form panel-decision preclusive-effect prior-panel-precedent strict-deadline writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
(distributed 9 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause permits the Eleventh Circuit to afford preclusive effect in a criminal case to a prior panel decision
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Due Process Clause permits the Eleventh Circuit to afford preclusive effect in a criminal case to a prior panel decision that was: based on a mandatory form allowing only bare legal argument; issued under a strict 30-day deadline; and immune from any petition for rehearing or a writ of certiorari. i
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor, respecting the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in <i>St. Hubert</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 590 U. S. ___ (2020) (Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari).
2020-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-26
Rescheduled.
2020-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-19
Rescheduled.
2020-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-05-12
Rescheduled.
2020-04-30
Supplemental brief of petitioner Alexis Valdes Gonzalez filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2019-12-18
Supplemental brief of petitioner Alexis Valdes Gonzalez filed.
2019-09-06
Rescheduled.
2019-07-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Rescheduled.
2019-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-06-10
Rescheduled.
2019-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-06-04
Rescheduled.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-16
Reply of petitioner Alexis Valdes Gonzalez filed.
2019-05-06
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 6, 2019.
2019-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 22, 2019 to May 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 22, 2019.
2019-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 21, 2019 to April 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-19
Response Requested. (Due March 21, 2019)
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Alexis Valdes Gonzalez
Andrew Lee Adler — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent