No. 18-7591
Kofi Kyei v. Tessica L. Swift, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process due-process,civil-procedure,turner-v-rogers,state- fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment state-statutes state-support-statute turner-v-rogers
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do state support statutes like the Oregon Statute (ORS) at Chapter 416.440 (8) contravene the 2011 United States Supreme Court rulings in Turner v. Rogers?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Do state support statutes like the Oregon Statute (ORS) at Chapter 416.440 (8), which is essentially the same today as it was in 2009, contravene the 2011 United States Supreme Court rulings in Turner v. Rogers, 564 US 431 (2011)? 2. Do state statutes like the Oregon Statute (ORS) at Chapter 416.440 (3) violate the United States Constitution, with respect to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-23
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent Oregon to respond filed.
2018-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)
Attorneys
Kofi Kyei
Kofi Kyei — Petitioner
Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent