Carlos E. Ponce v. D. Baughman, Warden
Securities
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying the issuance of a certificate of appealability based on the decision that the petitioner did not have substantial evidence to make a prima facie showing
No question identified. : \ QuOTieNS FoR REVIEW a — a CHE MINT CIRCUIT CevRT OF APPEALS DENIED THE ISSUANCE 3 of A CERTIEICATE OF APPEALABILITY RASOD UPON FEM DECISION yo THAT PETITIONER DIBNT FAVE SUBS TANTIAC EVIMENCE TE MAKE A 5 PRIMA FA cr€ SHOWING. & DID FE AMT CIRCLIT COURT ERR IN rte DENIAL? ANS Mid THAT 7 Denial VOL ATE PETITIONERS SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENSIFENT % RiGrys THE UNITES STATES ConSTITUTION? q \ w \ \ \ ro \ BY qooN is \ . . 6 \ , 0 \ i$ \ 4 oN 1 ‘\ u \ U2 \ U3 \ ay \ 15 \ wy \) 27 \\ 1g » \ UST ce ALL paRriéd re a —— 2 3 covet occ. APPEAR IN THE CAPTION OF THE CASE on THE y \ 8 \ b \ 1 \ g \ g \ , ; ‘ fr \ \t \ 3 \ 4 \ is \ i \ in \ : 8 \ ms 14 \ ~ 20 \ 2\ \ 22 \ \ 23 \ . : 24 \\ 7 \ x \ | UT \ cas \