No. 18-7599

Jesus E. Moreno Ornelas v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: compulsory-process constitutional-right criminal-procedure defense-witness discovery discovery-order due-process exclusion non-disclosure sixth-amendment tactical-advantage willful-nondisclosure
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment precludes exclusion of an undisclosed defense witness to enforce a discovery order if the non-disclosure was not willful or motivated by a desire to obtain a tactical advantage

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment precludes exclusion of an undisclosed defense witness to enforce a discovery order if the non-disclosure was not willful or motivated by a desire to obtain a tactical advantage. i

Docket Entries

2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-30
Reply of petitioner Jesus Moreno-Ornelas filed.
2019-04-23
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-03-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 29, 2019.
2019-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 29, 2019 to April 29, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 29, 2019.
2019-02-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 27, 2019 to March 29, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)

Attorneys

Jesus Moreno-Ornelas
Carlton Frederick GunnKaye, McLane, Bednarski, and Litt, Petitioner
Carlton Frederick GunnKaye, McLane, Bednarski, and Litt, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent