No. 18-7607
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: counsel-actions criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-plea-bargaining defendant-rights due-process federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-withdrawal plea-agreement plea-bargaining right-to-counsel sentencing voluntary-plea withdrawal-of-plea
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a plea was entered voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. IF A PLEA WAS NOT ENTERED VOLUNTARY, INTELLIGENTLY, , . OR KNOWINGLY WILL THAT BE CONSIDERED GROUNDS TO FILE A MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF A PLEA AGREEMENT PRIOR TO SENTENCING UNDER , FED.R.CRIM.P. 11(d) (2) (B) ? II. HOW CAN A DEFENDANT ENTER A VOLUNTARY PLEA AGREEMENT WITHOUT BEING FULLY, AND OR SIGNIFICANTLY AWARE OF ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE CASE ? IIL. WILL A COUNSEL ACTIONS BE CONSIDERED UNREASONABLY IF HE OR SHE DOESN'T FILE A MOTION AT THE REQUEST OF DEFENDANT ? Iv. WILL A COUNSEL ACTIONS BE CONSIDERED UNREASONABLE IF HE OR SHE DOES NOT ADVISE A DEFENDANT OF HIS OR HER RIGHTS? .
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)
Attorneys
Bruce White
Bruce White — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent