No. 18-7612
Nathaniel Bowens v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c)(1)(A) advance-knowledge aiding-and-abetting court-of-appeals crime-of-violence criminal-procedure drug-trafficking-crime firearm firearm-use mens-rea statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals' decision below contravenes this Court's holding in Rosemond v. United States
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court of Appeals’ decision below contravenes this Court’s holding in Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65, 78 (2014) that in order to aid and abet the use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A), a defendant must have “advance knowledge” of “a confederate’s design to carry a gun.” i
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)
Attorneys
Nathaniel Bowens
Nelson Starbranch Ebaugh — Nelson S. Ebaugh, P.C., Petitioner
Nelson Starbranch Ebaugh — Nelson S. Ebaugh, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent