No. 18-7614
Michael Jacoby v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment circuit-court-review circuit-split due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel eighth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ninth-circuit reasonable-jurist reasonable-jurist-standard sixth-amendment strickland-standard undermining-of-confidence-in-verdict
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
The 10th Circuit's application of a reasonable Jurist Standard as a full denial of Jadby's §2255 under the Strickland standard is in conflict with the 9 and 8th Circuit review standard of an "undermining of the confidence of the verdict" which would have corrected the denial of Jacoby's right to effective assistance of Counsel under the 6th Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael Jacoby
Michael Jacoby — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent