No. 18-7614
Michael Jacoby v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment circuit-court-review circuit-split due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel eighth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ninth-circuit reasonable-jurist reasonable-jurist-standard sixth-amendment strickland-standard undermining-of-confidence-in-verdict
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ISSUE PRESENTED The 10th Circuit's: application of a reasonable Jurist Standard as a full denial of Jacoby'"'s §2255 under the Strickland standard is in conflict ‘withthe, 9th and 8th Circuit review standard of an : o4 ‘ “8 ‘ : . “undermining of the, confidence of the verdict" which would have corrected the denial “of Jacoby's right to effective assistance of Counsel under the 6th Amendment. bee pry Br : : . oo ae I ‘ : 3 ; Lure 4
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent