No. 18-7630

In Re William W. Frey

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-01-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeals-review civil-rights court-duty due-process fraud-upon-the-court judicial-fraud perjury procedural-misconduct standing stare-decisis tainted-testimony testimony-integrity
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-03-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a conviction or civil judgment stand on tainted/perjury testimony?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented (Questions are cited under_Title 28 USC 1331) 1.) Can a conviction or civil judment stand on Tainted/Perjury Testimony? . . 2.) Does the Court have a duty, too correct tainted testimony? , 3.) Does tainted testimony constitute Fraud upon the Court? 4.) Does the Court have a Duty and must correct Fraud on the Court? (Where a conviction or summary judgment has been ill-gotten, through false means.) : 5.) Can a Appeals Court, rule on evidence of Fraud upon the Court brought for the first time? 6.) Is it a Court's duty, too acknowledge and rule on Fraud upon the Court? ‘ 7.) Does the Appeals Court abuse its own authority, not following the doctrine of Stare Decisis and Horiizontal Stare when : evidence supports party's standing? . . 8.) Is it mandatory, that at any stage of proceedings, a Court must perform its duty. Too, investigate Fraud upon the Court? . , 2 ‘

Docket Entries

2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2018-05-30
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2019)

Attorneys

William Frey
William Frey — Petitioner
William Frey — Petitioner