No. 18-7633
Michael Lynn Heard v. Scott Solomon, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction standing supremacy-clause title-42-usc-1983
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2019-03-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Section 16-123-105 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure violates the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution by denying this Court of jurisdiction to hear a Title 42 U.S.C. 1983 claim
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION(S} PRESENTED (. Whether Section FAG of the Aekonsos Lureso€ Cs \ Procedure | Violakes tne Sagremocy, Crause ofXhe United Stodes Consttastion by degring Mis Cowct of SESH ON to heac a Title FLUS.C.1063 Claims from wakiogeat nds, A. Wheher Ve C row Coure of Van ucen County \ Ac Kansas Cove chy held Yrok he Use OF the Tem" roliciows Groseasion, Bolely To a” Tile 42 USc-.19$3 Claw.
Docket Entries
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-02-26
Waiver of right of respondent Harry Foster, Chad Brown, and Angela Byrd to respond filed.
2019-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent David Hess to respond filed.
2018-06-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2019)
Attorneys
David Hess
Harry Foster, Chad Brown, and Angela Byrd