No. 18-7634
Lincoln E. Fox v. Neil Turner, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidentiary-error fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel victim-testimony witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court's admission of a videotaped statement of the victim violated the defendant's right to a fair trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1) Reasonable jurists could debate whether the trial court's admission of a, videotaped statesent of the victim in violation of Bvid.R. 803(4) denied Appellant a fundamentally fair trial. . 2) Jurists could debate whether Appellant's convictions were not supported by séfficient evidence. : 3) Jurists could debate whether trial court's admission of testimony by Nurse . Homer about the veracity of the child witness denied Appellant a fundamentally ; fair trial. 4) Appellent was denied effective assistance of trial & appellate counsel . .
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent Neil Turner, Warden to respond filed.
2018-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Neil Turner, Warden
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent