Whether Mr. Hol was denied effective assistance of counsel required by the Federal constitution's Sixth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \) Whether Mr. Hol was denied effective assistance. of counsel required by the Cederol constitution's sixth Amendment when his trial counsel refused 4p porticigcke in the tvial proceeding 5, thereby allowing &j complete breakdown in tho adversaytal process, and denyiits My tle JI a fair Vial? a) Whether the. State Court's fin ding Gre, couitvaury to the United Stedes Supreme Courts holdings in United Hates v Cronic ? 3) Whether the seatencing court ered when it cepericd Promila presumptive sentencing guideline range by using tho. sen diag enhancements codified ad § I3A-12-aso and 8 (3A-12-27D as agaronading Couckors although tho AlaloumaLegis lature. prescrt bed Lud wo astditional punishment pursrcact to wy statutes shall apply. ; No, wu ; IN THE . , SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES , oo Harold Holl — PETITIONER ; (Your Name) vs. State of Alebame RESPONDENT(S) . ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO | Malan Court of Crimiaal Appeals | (NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE) PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (Your Nanie) 200 Wallace Arive. (Address) : Clio, Mebame SCOT a eee Eee (City, State, Zip Code) . : (Phone Number) ; .