Arturo Huerta v. Ron Davis, Warden
Whether the natural and probable consequences of a criminal act can support a conviction for second-degree murder under the 'natural and probable consequences' doctrine
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED () Whether The Natural Bnd Probable Com Stouew ed Te Cosvict Faq. Sedenad Degree Murder ral . Cvidenee Rule “When ids sole caked Ln Sune, Tr Steed ee (tanta WSthcetiand That Confuse THe Tae Violating [4 Air ld. (OTHE Trakson Shandand must Be goplic d With Rep 7 , rey tte Te The Substaukive laments, of ECRimidal ofleuse ae ‘Defined’ by State L Aw, Cb) The . _ Natuaal oc Probable Cange uenee of 2K eanet Muradin Weuld Violate beep of ae Y-ULS. Bs Malres 13 Tivplied” when -. ae) of RNothte, Person in hoximatel, Rused \ ; “ Ky Ad Bet, The nlalucal awd Probable ONSE : > ~ ~ p