Did trial counsel have a conflict of interest by simultaneously representing Mr. Benitez and a defense witness?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1, Did traf counsel have conflict enterast ly simuttanecusly Laplesenting Mn Beniléz and a ae Lohass ; violating Mr. Benifez's Sixth Apunclment ight to ofbctive QSUSTANCL 6 counsel ? 2. Wes Mn Benitiz entitled to an tvidertfany hearing on his chum that Triad counsel hed 0. confict of interest 4 ; Simutfanaously Aephesenting My. Bénitez. anal a chfehse unriness 7 3. Did! the United! States Court of Appeals for the Minth Careuit impose an unduly burdensome Crile of Appeelolihty GA) standord thaf -otfhtarcones This Cou Procodent woken Z denied My, Benitez a COA om his habees claim that his Trial counsel labored under é. ofl intonest tn vicktion of his Sixth Amundmut right 0 fective cousel 7