Did the Appellate Division, First Department err in finding Respondents immune pursuant to Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1. As the New York State Attorney General and = . Manhattan District Attorney were not acting as : advocates for the people when they permitted Petitioner’s contractual property rights to be rewritten and voided under color of law, did the Appellate Division, First Department err in finding Respondents immune pursuant to Jmbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)? 2. Has the New York State Courts’ misapplication of Jmb/er resulted in the obstruction of justice and violations of Petitioner’s and New York State : ; citizens’ Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments rights? 3.. Does the Appellate Division, First Department’s February 8, 2018 Decision conflict with the case cited, ; Moore v. Dormin, 252 AD 2d 421 (ist Dept. 1998), which held that “not all discretionary actions are absolutely immune”? ; 4. Is it unconstitutional for the New York State Courts to force the victim of an unlawful act to pay the litigation fees incurred by the Manhattan District ; Attorney and the New York State Attorney General? : ii