Michael R. Spengler v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.
Whether the widespread policy of the L.A. Superior Court and the L.A. Sheriff's Department, known as the Perkins Operation, which allows undercover agents to be placed inside living quarters without Miranda warnings and to coercively interrogate targets on crimes where the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is not attached, violates the Constitution
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED THE L.A Superior Court, DA FIC Ane THE LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S DepART MENT INSIDE HE Jarl Have ADOPTED AND IMPLEMENTED A “WIDESPTeEAB" POLICY LABLED THE PERKIN'S CPERATION PURSUANT tO U.S: SupeeUe Court CERTIoBART ELLENOIS V. PERKING YALL US 222 CAIO) WHERE UNDER COVER AGENTS ARE PLACED INSIDE LIVING QUARTERS with THE SENMATE TARGET 3“ PERKINS ) WHERE MITANDA WARNINGS ARE NoT REQUIRED ANA THE AGENT TAPE RECORDS /airechy ENTEROGMES "PERKINS / TARGET “ON CRIMES WHERE THE SixTH AMENDS MENT RIGNT TO CouNseL ES NOT ATTACHED. HOWEVER, THE LASDARE USING MEXICAN MaAEIA KNOW SN SHOTCANER ENMATES, Wht ARE SENT INTO THE LyVAING QUARTERS <8 TELL TRE VARGET | Y PERKINS "TRAT HE-ANS His FAMILY HAVE A GESENUGAT ANB HETON THE IE LIVES AND GOTNTO ENALORATE DETAILS OF SMAFIA BoLitics*or How AND WUE AND THE TARGETS only RECoURSe \& te PXCKASE ANS/OR Recieve protection! ROM HIM INCLUDING CONFESSING HIS CRANES FOR crenibility purposes THERE AEE OTHER THStANCES Where TREY ee tneezes MEN ANd ASSASINS +25 WN \ TN x*Ve Tarcets spt k AMeNONeNTAteaned Case thes & ACE Qvesth oNS oF eee APO TANCE ARFE CHING MANY People; AND WN NO WAY DOT seme 4B correc’ lower Court errors OF BeCisiONs , Bot IT Seer 4o review -nic Abo pted ANO perhaps misapplied case JAA) Pole, ASW contradicts CASES IN other COUCES THAT ThiS operation iS A pradvel oF coercion...