Is diligence in discovering new evidence a condition to filing a postconviction motion or a condition to obtaining relief on that motion?

Questions Presented This case presents two questions pertaining to the “proper filing” requirement that were left open by Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408 (2005) and that have split the circuit courts of appeals: (1) is diligence in discovering new evidence a condition to filing a postconviction motion or a condition to obtaining relief on that motion; and (2) must a trial court unambiguously state that a postconviction motion is untimely so that a prisoner can know that it was not “properly filed”? i