No. 18-7666
Rowy De Jesus Vasquez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553 advisory-guidelines criminal-sentencing departure district-court-discretion due-process notice notice-requirement sentencing-departures sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation ussg-1b1.1 ussg-5k2.0
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court must have provided defendant notice for the grounds for a sentence above the range recommended by the advisory guidelines range when the district court's reasoning for a such a departure from the guidelines tracks the language under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)(2)(A)G@)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the district court must have provided defendant notice for the grounds for a sentence above the range recommended by the advisory guidelines range when the district court’s reasoning for a such a departure from the guidelines tracks the language under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)(2)(A)G@). See USSG §§ 1B1.1(b), 5K2.0(a)(1)(B). i
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Rowy De Jesus Vasquez
Ali Kamalzadeh — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
Ali Kamalzadeh — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent