No. 18-7679

Jeriton Lavar Curry v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c) appeal-waiver appellate-review constitutional-error criminal-procedure jurisdiction plain-error sentencing sentencing-jurisdiction unconstitutional-sentence
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Appeals Court err by granting the Government's motion to enforce an invalid appeal waiver, after determining that Currys' issue was non-frivolous, and ordering the parties to brief on the issue?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did the Appeals Court err by granting the Government's motion to enforce.an invalid appeal waiver, after determining that Currys' issue was non-frivolous, and ordering the parties to brief on the issue? 2. Does a valid appeal waiver bar a Court of Appeals from correcting an unconstitutional sentence were the defendant's argument, if true, would mean the District Court lacked jurisdiction to sentence defendant under 18 U.S.C. sub-section 924(c)? , 3. Does the Court of Appeals lack jurisdiction to correct plain error, due to invalid appeal waiver? . : : 4:

Docket Entries

2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-08
Supplemental brief of petitioner Jeriton Lavar Curry filed. (Distributed)
2019-01-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2019)
2018-12-07
Application (18A592) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 7, 2019.
2018-11-01
Application (18A592) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 9, 2017 to February 7, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Jeriton Lavar Curry
Jeriton Lavar Curry — Petitioner
Jeriton Lavar Curry — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent