No. 18-7682
Stacie Demers v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review circuit-court counsel criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-claim sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Circuit Court of Appeals should have decided Ms. Demers's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Circuit Court of Appeals should have decided Ms. Demers’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. i
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Stacie Demers
James Matthew Branden — Law Office of James M. Branden, Petitioner
James Matthew Branden — Law Office of James M. Branden, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent