No. 18-7683

Deandre Anderson v. Daniel Lesatz, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violations criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment miranda-rights new-evidence post-conviction-relief postconviction-relief probable-cause standing statute-of-limitations trial-errors wrongful-conviction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-03-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the cases stated apply to this case?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Does the cases stated apply to this case? 2. Does the statute of limitation yield to the imperative of correcting a fundamentally unjust incarceration? 3. Is having new evidence the only possibility of granting a writ or postconviction procedure? 4. Is constitutional violations enough to reverse a conviction? 5. Was it improper for the prosecution to refer to harassment and stalking allegation without presenting proof? 6. Can multiple trial errors result in a wrongful conviction? 7. Is there probable cause for the officer to conduct a warrantless search or warrantless arrest? 8. Did the officer violate Due Process and 4 Amendment Right to being safe in one’s place, person and other effects? 9. Is assault or rape an act of the victim or the offender? 10. Is testimonial evidence without physical evidence enough for a conviction after having various errors before and during the trial process? 11. Was Miranda warnings required when the officer contacted the defendant? 12. Could coercion and/or duress exist from the officer’s action?

Docket Entries

2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2018-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Deandre Anderson
DeAndre Maurice Anderson — Petitioner
DeAndre Maurice Anderson — Petitioner