No. 18-7687
Dre'Shawn Markuise Lee v. William Muniz, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus institutional-confinement pro-se state-court-appeals statute-of-limitations timeliness
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When does the federal habeas petition clock begin to run for an inmate confined in an institution after the state supreme court has denied their state habeas petition?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED For an mate Confined in an institution MM Pa se wh enn does their Federal Habeas Petition clock loegin de Tun Once The Supreme Couct of Here Siute has denied these shute habeas Pelition,. he da dhe. habeas Pet Mio, Was denied or re. day dew peti bone recetuel Ure. Le aA Petitioner is an inmate Confined ina an tnstiution ere ceeing IN Prd Se Are Yrey quali lies Gon equi table Olin a pred, ‘9 toc the Aumber of days it takes third . Y Carevec to deliver wm Courts decision Le suid Peritionec? , '
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-15
Waiver of right of respondent Muniz, Warden to respond filed.
2018-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Dre'Shawn Lee
Dre'Shawn Markuise Lee — Petitioner
Greg Lewis
Allen R. Crown — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent