No. 18-7692
Byron Anthony Horn v. United States
Tags: criminal-law criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process federal-criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction indictment plea-bargaining pleading reasonable-doubt reasonable-sentence sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether facts that alter the range of 'reasonable' federal sentences must be pleaded in the indictment in federal cases?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether facts that alter the range of “reasonable” federal sentences must be pleaded in the indictment in federal cases? ii PARTIES Byron Anthony Horn, is the petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the respondent, who was the plaintiff-appellee below. ili
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Byron Anthony Horn
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent