No. 18-7694
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process faretta-v-california judicial-discretion legal-timeliness pro-se-representation right-to-counsel right-to-self-representation self-representation timeliness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How soon in the criminal proceeding must a defendant decide between proceeding by counsel or pro se?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED “How soon in the criminal proceeding must a defendant decide between proceeding by counsel or pro se?” Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 852 (1975) (Blackmun, J., dissenting).
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-10
Reply of petitioner Raymond Crespo filed.
2019-05-30
Brief of respondent State of New York in opposition filed.
2019-03-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 3, 2019.
2019-03-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 3, 2019 to June 3, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-04
Response Requested. (Due April 3, 2019)
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent State of New York to respond filed.
2019-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)
2019-01-09
Application (18A704) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until February 13, 2019.
2018-12-27
Application (18A704) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 14, 2019 to February 13, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Attorneys
Raymond Crespo
Robert S. Dean — Center for Appellate Litigation, Petitioner
Robert S. Dean — Center for Appellate Litigation, Petitioner
State of New York