No. 18-7707
Antonio Anguiano v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-justice-act defense-counsel defense-function due-process independent-counsel judicial-control sixth-amendment structural-error
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, in upholding structural error flowing from judicial control over the defense function under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, the Ninth Circuit went against the Sixth Amendment principle of independent counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented As a matter of first impression: whether, in upholding structural error flowing from judicial control over the defense function under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 USS.C. § 3006A, the Ninth Circuit went against the Sixth Amendment principle of independent counsel that this Court has established? Absolutely. i
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)
2018-10-17
Application (18A396) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 24, 2019.
2018-10-01
Application (18A396) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 25, 2018 to January 24, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Antonio Anguiano
Zoe J. Dolan — Zoe J. Dolan, Esq., Petitioner
Zoe J. Dolan — Zoe J. Dolan, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent