Cesar Gomez v. Texas
DueProcess Immigration
Whether Texas Penal Code § 21.02, is Constitutional under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . A: Whether Texas Penal Code § 21.02, is Constitutional under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? B: Whether a State Jury Charge must accurately describe the = charge against the defendant, and make no comment on the : weight of the evidence? C: Whether a Gefendant is entitled to effective assisatnce of counsel when deciding whether to accept a plea agreement? D: Whether defense counsel has a duty to object to inadmissible evidence? : E: Whether defense counsel has a duty to fully investigate the facts of the case prior to trial? , F: Whether counsel has a duty to object to circumstantial evidence not related to the case, minus benefit of a nexus, and completely legal to possess? G: Whether defense counsel has a duty to object to inadmissible evidence and request curative instructions? H: Whether the existence of biological evidence, in an area ' frequented by petitioner, equates guilt? I: Whether the State of Texas may use improper methods, i.e. . perjury, improper comments, personal beliefs, etc., to produce a wrongful conviction?. J: Whether the State must reveal agreements with State witnesses ) concerning immigration Status? ; ; ii