James B. Curry v. Supreme Court of the United States, et al.
Was Weck's Constitutional Rights Violated
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 2 Was Weck b's Constifufional Waits Vlate 6 Ws Painh PF 5 Constitutional Rrgit’s Viela when Bap nities Court § Ubmitted Filed Aowmen}s to A Neoring on Dec hs 20l-kGenied Dec dg, OI Thus Hie WS. pisprictCo ut Aocuimettt heing — Fiked deta Oe4,3,a0%4, and The Hh circuits Bled” See Exhibits ‘Then See Order ated.) ew Stating Haat the appea| is Aismissed For eve ON: Jurisdiction y, because here: Was No Tesponse. Filed +o the U-S. distelctCount’s Order dated. 11-30-14, € oh F i Nete, Platitite Tow SUbmitt's # 11-7064 Dodd Filed en QS. Finibit ean. Pafricia S. connor, — A" And U.5.0.C4 Clerk Colunbia,Sl Filed Dees, O14. 45 Exhibit, Blume. . . , ANd the order, fated, Dec ad, win as (Exhibit Neto Hw Consealmenf Ero M both — Prefudice court's inthis Matfer p lati Fe prevails . onthe Areund's oF Presdice but doe's not ask that ay Criminal acon be taken For obstrudton once RelieE has been qrauted to Plain EF