No. 18-7737
Tyshawn Simmons v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law controlled-substances-act criminal-procedure drug-crimes due-process federalism sentencing standing statutory-interpretation tenth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Controlled Substances Act's prohibition on the distribution of marijuana violates the Due Process Clause and the Tenth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED VL) Panis “excaSag in" Defaed am Tle 21 usc BUSeMa) UNER PRs Thee’ pee? 2) WihaT NEXUS rs Reeurxd Foe SUECOIAL Peon WH a» @i1OteN Va) rrr Pi Aarne ~ ~ _. “TT Z . ‘ — Ue — Sr . e , Tm ee . 1 ~ oe : _. ay oo ? . owe Re ween alk "Tae : . ~ — é —— . 1 te ‘ ‘ ‘ 3. , bccs A Gacy Plea WaweS Deed’ @luls To Caliente, a DekecIne _ TENDICThestT THAT Fats To AUcbe THe tmpuci clevent expuciya, THA OFead Bota THE TFTA and SIM Arenteegt OF The sted STATES Comat Mion >
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent