No. 18-7744

Corey Clark v. Alabama

Lower Court: Alabama
Docketed: 2019-02-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-law due-process ex-post-facto retroactivity
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

1- DOES THE STATE OF ALABAMAS ACT 2OIY-IGS
VIOLATE THE EX POST FACTO CLAUSE OF THE TEVO PURPOSE'S.

2) DOES THE STATE OF ALABAMA'S ACT 2OIY-I6S THAT
REPEALED RLA.CODE I975 SIBA-5-91 VIOLATE THE EX POST
FACTO PROHIBITION CLAUSE.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the state of Alabama ACV 2014-169 violate the ex post facto clause of the U.S. Constitution?

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent Alabama to respond filed.
2018-09-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2019)

Attorneys

Alabama
Beth Slate PoeAL Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Corey Clark
Corey Clark — Petitioner