No. 18-7744

Corey Clark v. Alabama

Lower Court: Alabama
Docketed: 2019-02-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-law due-process ex-post-facto retroactivity
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the state of Alabama ACV 2014-169 violate the ex post facto clause of the U.S. Constitution?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i). DOES THE STATE OF ALABAMA ACV 2014-169 VEOLYTE THE EX POST FACTO CLYUSé OF THE Tivo PURPOSE’S,. 9). DOES THE STATE OF ALARAMA'S ACT AOIN-165 THAT REPEALED ALA. COME 1975 S$(2A-F-FTe) VEOLATE THE EX POST FACTO PROMZBITION CiA~uUsé..

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent Alabama to respond filed.
2018-09-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2019)

Attorneys

Alabama
Beth Slate PoeAL Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Beth Slate PoeAL Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Corey Clark
Corey Clark — Petitioner
Corey Clark — Petitioner