No. 18-7746
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: thereby rendering the use of evidence uncovered d constitutional-rights criminal-procedure evidence florida-v-wells fourth-amendment inventory-search probable-cause ruse search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment
FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether errors in an inventory search report are indicative of a 'ruse' under Florida v. Wells, thereby rendering the use of evidence uncovered during the inventory search a violation of Joseph Davis's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether errors in an inventory search report are indicative of a “ruse” under Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1, 4 (1990), thereby rendering the use of evidence uncovered during the inventory search a violation of Joseph Davis’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. i
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Joseph Davis
Joshua Lincoln Gordon — Law Office of Joshua Gordon, Petitioner
Joshua Lincoln Gordon — Law Office of Joshua Gordon, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent