Andrew Chien v. LeClairRyan, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the order is void due to administrative error and lack of jurisdiction
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. For No.18-6346, the question is whether the order is void which committed administrative error, a nonjudicial act by not issuing summons to defendants in the original complaint based on claims of Defendants’ violation of Fourth Amendment, and engagement of Subject Error, and Territorial Jurisdiction Error under color of State act. 2. For No. 18-1523, the question is whether the order contained errors of unfairness and due process by (a) to use the void order in the Doctrine of Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel; (b) abused the two-years’ time bar by omitted the time-toll law of Virginia regarding false. imprisonment; (c) abused the qualified immunity of the Clerks, Sheriffs and officer of Virginia Government; (4) omitted 42USC §1983 Claims against Commonwealth of Virginia, and State Judges in declaration and injunction relief. . ; 3. Additional question is whether the principles of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) should be executed in Commonwealth of Virginia. ~ii~