No. 18-7759
Travis Buckner v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: effective-representation fourteenth-amendment motion-to-continue right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-court-discretion trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Defendant was denied his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the Defendant was denied his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights to assistance of counsel by the denial of his Motion to Continue his trial where there were objective and compelling reasons to support his request necessary for an effective representation by his counsel? i
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Travis Buckner
Curt Obront — Obront Corey, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent