No. 18-7765
Burgess Massey v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act elements-clause habeas-corpus johnson-rule johnson-v-united-states new-york-robbery residual-clause retroactivity second-or-successive-habeas sentencing-enhancement violent-felony
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the New York State offense of robbery in the third degree is a 'violent felony' under the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Whether, on a second or successive § 2255 motion, the movant’s claim relies on Johnson’s invalidation of the residual clause when the original sentencing court rested its ACCA-finding on the elements clause rather than the residual clause. di
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-02-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2019)
2018-12-19
Application (18A652) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until February 1, 2019.
2018-12-17
Application (18A652) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 2, 2019 to February 1, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Attorneys
Burgess Massey
Darrell Bernard Fields — FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF NY INC, Petitioner
Darrell Bernard Fields — FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF NY INC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent