Whether petitioner Boyett was denied effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER. PETITIONER. Boyerr WAS DENIED EFFECTINE ASSISTANCE _OF COUNSEL UNDER THE Sixta AmendmenT Because THE GreeuiT ofNION CON~ — FLICTS WITH CLEARLY ESTABUSHED Law OF S7RTeKLAND Vv, WASHINGTON, Yoo U.S. 668 (1984); Bewy, Miner, No, 05-5235 (2d Cie, 2007); : Ake v. OKLA, , #70 US, 68 (1985); GeRSTEN V, SenKouski, 426 U.S, So Fd 5e2? (2005); Tacops v. Hon, (32d Cir. 2005)3 Ano. a Pavey. Hous (2d Cir. 2001); Smee v. Locdagr, 23 63d 1280 “C2ak Cn. 199%). yer. Pe7inonee Boye tr WAS NEVER AFFORDED THE BeEneriT oF REWMEW_UNDER THESE cases By THe NEW MEXICO SuPmeme ~ Court, AND THE uniren,<rATES District Couet (FEperar) DeniED RE~ _ LIF, AS DID Au OTHER "Revnawine” Courrs? see App. A, : WHETHER THE Chew T CourRT CommiTTED ERROR WHEN, AFTER . _ RPRWYING THE HARMLESS ERR? SranpAeD. of BecouT v. ABKattAmson, 507 US, G19 (1993) AND CONCLUDED THAT THE CONSTITUTIONAL ERROR. WAS SIGNIFICANT 70. THE Jury'S DETERMINATION, THE CiRowiT COurT's DENiAL OF PeTi7ioNER BOyETT'S REGuESTED HABEAS RELIEF CONFLICTS \NITH THIS COUCT'S RULING iN -KOTTEAKDS V. UNITED STATES , 328_US.750 C1946), WHICH HELD THAT GUILTY NERDICTS ARISING FRom Tuy TRIALS CONTAINING, CONSTITUTIONAL ERRORS SHOwp BE UPHELD . ONLY WHEN THE ERRoR. DOES NOT imPERMISsiBLY SwAy THE They's VERDIT? APP. A oo whic inlGuupea Ciao OF Viouavious HS Due Pela RIS WADE. , iT _Woutd Be ” Counter INTUITIVE 70 RenbER A DaNEL OF Gouke CoA FALED Te INDICATE Ax 1Saue P SEE ABA Am Batons E OOO ee ee Pn Gonsipeame AUTHORITY Axe DiscReTs UNDER 16 W.3.¢, Secppu “By THe Ws. Dismier Couert Sex Recows AB E22) a SEN (ARETHER. Tie Cheouir Cour Commirren ERése Wien If eAeD To Review — To _Foem SheciFic er 2? See Ap A,B,C Do . 3 oF 34 , 4 . ° Among me Recorn Pesscaren, Wihinich Tie CReuir Couer Cmanen. ere or | Cancuuéiols OF aw Diseearenine PEnbick Bogerrs ExPaer \inices HEIL. Amone THe Recorn Peeseiten, is Tees A PLAIN ExRor, Fousd THAT Tis Couar 1S Witty 173 Sugispicm J) DEdwe? sce APRA BL > Boyerr's RE®ueSTED Reise Because THe CiRow't Opinion GaNFLicrs with _ Cenkiy Esmppusien Law OF RHAGi Vv. Aewu2, 307 FE 3A 703, J06 (2A mikiy EsmBusten Law oF Rinci Vv. Aem2, 307 F3d 03, j06 (2A Un. 2002) Aan JREVNG V. Davis, 729 F.3d 326, 350-57 (Sil Op, zeny? Sez APA —.w"N"Nnyxn... 4 oF 34