No. 18-7783

Todd Eugene Cannady v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: california-penal-code california-penal-code-211 categorical-approach commentary crime-of-violence johnson johnson-ruling residual-clause sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation u.s.s.g.-4b1.2
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can California robbery under California Penal Code § 211 be a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, where Johnson invalidated the residual clause of the mandatory Guidelines and the commentary has no freestanding legal force?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented 1. Can California robbery under California Penal Code § 211 be a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, where Johnson invalidated the residual clause of the mandatory Guidelines and the commentary has no freestanding legal force? 2. Can federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) be a crime of violence under the elements clause of U.S.8.G. § 4B1.2, where the offense fails to require any intentional use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical force? i

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2019)

Attorneys

Todd Eugene Cannady
Brianna Fuller MircheffOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Brianna Fuller MircheffOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent