No. 18-7800
Rene Antonio Aguilar v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-justice criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-criminal-justice procedural-obligations rita-standard rita-v-united-states sentencing sentencing-arguments
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Immigration
CriminalProcedure Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a district court at sentencing fail to respond to a party's non-frivolous sentencing arguments?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Following Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007), can a district court at sentencing fail to respond to a party's non-frivolous sentencing arguments, as the Second, Fifth, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits have held, or must the court respond, as the Third, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, Tenth, and D.C. Circuits have held? prefix
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Rene Antonio Aguilar
Jami Lynn Ferrara — Law Office of Jami L. Ferrara, Petitioner
Jami Lynn Ferrara — Law Office of Jami L. Ferrara, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent