No. 18-7806
George Berka v. City of Middletown, Connecticut
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure appeal-rights appeals civil-procedure due-process judicial-review notice notice-of-rights public-health-law state-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Connecticut Department of Public Health act improperly, and deny the Petitioner his right to due process, by failing to inform him on how to properly appeal its decision to the Connecticut Superior Court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Connecticut Department of Public Health act improperly, and deny the Petitioner his right to due process, by failing to inform him on how to properly appeal its decision to the Connecticut Superior Court?
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-06-25
Petitioner complied with order of April 15, 2019.
2019-04-30
Application (18A1119) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until July 5, 2019.
2019-04-23
Application (18A1119) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of April 15, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
2019-04-15
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 6, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-06-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)
Attorneys
George Berka
George Berka — Petitioner