Did trial counsel perform ineffectively at Petitioner's second trial

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1 Did trial counsel perform ineffectively at Petitioner's second trial,when Petitioner's first trial,in which there was no mention of ceil phone testimony, ended in a hung jury, by failing to object on Fourth Amendment grounds when the prosecution in the second trial made cell-site location information the literal bookends of its case? 2 Is the Stored Communications Act, 18 USC §§ 27012712 Unconstitutional because it allows cell site location information to be divulged to law enforcement without a warrant? 3 Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to examine the Detroit Police Department's request for the §2703(d) Order to determine whether or not it complied with the . mandatory language of the SCA and subsequently to examine the magistrate's granting of the request? 4 Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to the cellular telephone evidence on Fourth Amendment grounds and to request a pretrial suppression hearing regarding the same. . 5 Was appellate counsel ineffective for failing to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel? 6 Was the Detroit Police Department's acquisition of Petitioner's cell-site records a search under the Fourth Amendment? i UST OF PARTIES All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. The sole party is Lakeland Correctional Facility's Warden Noah Nagy.