Whether disparate impact on African Americans should be considered at Batson's third step

Question presented Courts often reject Batson! claims where the prospective juror at issue has a relative with a criminal conviction, a reason that has a disparate impact on African Americans. Should this Court grant certiorari to reiterate its admonition in Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991), that disparate impact should be considered at Batson’s third step? ' Batson v. Kentucky, 476 US. 79 (1986). 1