Whether a criminal defendant's jury trial was fundamentally violated due to the trial judge's jury instructions that changed and expanded the definition of an essential element of the crime charged

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A. LHe THEeR A Fatal Tudeé!'s JURY LAS TRuUATIALs Bitomé UstfotStrrurrcaaal rl VislATior.l OF Due PROCESS UlHewt THE TRIAL TUL CHALLES AAD EXPALUNS THE DéFrilt trast OF Ail ESSenttzal ELEMELT OF THE LRamé LHAKEED, os. LAHETHER A LRrairatal De Fetal 2s Deaitet\ DF THE RIGHT TD BE Fousit\ albT LiltLTY BF 7HE Lktmé LHARGED UlHek THE TRIAL TUDdGé'5 JURY TALSTRULTIOI CHALGES ALD EXTLMDS THE DéFralatro.t OF AL ESSEATAL Elemente OF THE LRIWL CHARLEL). 3. ULHETHER THE Aavektotetr rs RELIEVED DF oe ITs BukDéicl OF (RAOF BEYOAMD A REASONABLE DoauBT usted THE TRIAL TUDE LHALMGES AA EXfPAMDS THE DiFalt ral OF Al EsséntrzAlL ELEMEMT Ae LAAMETHER A LArmrdtAL Dt Felt ATs COnLvILTrot Ds DBIAL AE Ufdsl HASUFFLLIEAT EviDedé ubHecl A 7KAL TUDLE LHAAGES ASD EXPL THE DiFeilt rat DF AL ESSebTial ELimett OF THE CRomE LHAKS ED, TUst BitAuse. the NeSiddadt wWlAs KeAuiked £A REMIStER AS A SEX DGecclee. | fi)