No. 18-7828
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-law-section-440.10 due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel penal-law-section-70.02 persistent-violent-felony sentencing void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the New York State Supreme Court err in holding that, as-applied, the part of Penal Law Section 70.02, Subdivision one (c) challenged as void-for-vagueness is not unconstitutional?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is + Did the Now York Stale Supreme Court vey in holding thst, a5-applied the part of Penal Law deetion 70.02, Subdivision one 6, challenged. as —s void fer vagueNSS is act vnconst: utienal ? .
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)