Whether the lower courts abused their discretion in denying petitioner a certificate of appealability

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED. 1. WHETHER THE LOWER COURTS ABUSED IT'S DISCRETION IN DENYING PETITIONER A CERTIFICATE OF . : APPEALABILITY (COA) WHERE JURIST OF REASON COULD DISAGREE WITH THE LOWER COURT'S RESOLUTION OF PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT? MIRAND V. ARIZONA, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d. 694, (1966)? WIGGINS V. SMITH, 539 U.S. 510, 523, 538, 156 L. Ed. 2d. 471 (2003): — 2. WHETHER THE COURT IN DISMISSING PETITIONER'S . CLAIMS WITHOUT REACHING THE MERITS, DEPRIVE PETITIONER OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS? ol . | wd