No. 18-7845
Philip Andra Grigsby v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law contact-restrictions court-of-appeals due-process family-law fourteenth-amendment juvenile-justice minor-children parental-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Has the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by denying a parent contact with his non-victim 16 year-old son and monitored non-physical contact with his 15 year-old daughter?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED . ; Has the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by denying a parent contact with his non-victim 16 year-old son and monitored non-physical contact with his 15 year-old daughter? II
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent