Whether the exhaustion of legal assistance measures, especially in the case of a mentally disabled defendant, can conclusively overcome the respondent's right to freedom

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A. Since ih is Modoc Pokey +o Maintain Gee parole pessibiliay oe guideline s pul svaay as PO 06.05.)03 , 2 te 1S Initially to Asa discreda eh Mich. Stase Court grearly in FeCe Pion +o 4h@ MODOC in catalyst y ay+er vb hag come all the way vo whe US. Supreme Coutt , can éXhaus tion poece dear espectally ua Cover of a mentally dsabled beigawes porarial to have a rioht +o Yreelom Conclusively against +he Mes pendent ? J aA. HR ia Jee? rath , Can ie be d.spysed in as racial / vader color oy laut dstinctions d.stinction thas Conspiracy creel meen. yee eee to % Cumulative 1A my case with all wie “3 allegations & cours APPAALEES along with TDJudrcial rvle ° 3) Can tt bé credible they To axsempred ko @Xhaust he legal a5SiSvanl& measure oF ovr &tu Amerdbineat 4 oa + oH times befe proceeded En Pro Se as a raeavall disabied layman deberkant ° (|. Shovld a le obviously d:scredible On pare £ +-he Lt Vlhrke@ Cauee apporxed lawyers be mesrheds ko ay potas theanr Since my claim of deferse cold 4L@ Sood Simply by Counxer Claim vader YASiqgg © 5. —<s ix possible ther hs Oye ea Court covld threaten the wash pyrarne Sanctions eh Secavve C,. PrevEarsaay hE an Go. even respordian & relero.ng “) remedy &* Ake Courks time any Uraher alien O reSponsé vadely vaesCecaive ?