No. 18-7851
Vincent Lynden Young v. Debbie Asuncion, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions due-process expert-testimony false-evidence federal-habeas habeas-corpus opinion repudiated-expert senate-bill senate-bill-1134 statutory-provisions
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an opinion of an expert that has been repudiated by the expert who originally provided the opinion at a hearing or trial constitutes false evidence and a due process violation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION (S) PRESENTED UNDER EXISTING LAWS ' SENATE BILL § 1134 (Ce) (1) OPINION OF EXPERT THAT HAVE BEEN REPUDIATED BY THE EXPERT WHO ORIGINALLY, PROVIDED THE OPINION AT A HEARING OR TRIAL IS CONSIDERED FALSE EVIDENCE . , DUE PROCESS VIOLATION. FEDERAL HABEAS GROUND : TWO 8(b) 5 Of 11 (14) (2) pe — (@) 2 . ,
Docket Entries
2019-08-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-05-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)