No. 18-7851

Vincent Lynden Young v. Debbie Asuncion, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions due-process expert-testimony false-evidence federal-habeas habeas-corpus opinion repudiated-expert senate-bill senate-bill-1134 statutory-provisions
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

UNDER EXISTING LAWS ' SENATE BILL § 1134 (e) (1)
OPINION OF EXPERT THAT HAVE BEEN REPUDIATED BY
THE EXPERT WHO ORIGINALLY PROVIDED THE OPINION
AT A HEARING OR TRIAL IS CONSIDERED FALSE EVIDENCE
DUE PROCESS VIOLATION.
FEDERAL HABEAS GROUND : TWO 8(b) 5 Of 11

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an opinion of an expert that has been repudiated by the expert who originally provided the opinion at a hearing or trial constitutes false evidence and a due process violation

Docket Entries

2019-08-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-05-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)

Attorneys

Vincent Lynden Young
Vincent Lynden Young — Petitioner